Law School Admission Council (LSAC) and their refusal to comply with a survey of accommodation practices by the United States Government Accountability Office, as well as how the American Bar Association was urging the LSAC to end their practice of "flagging" scores of students who took the LSAT with disability accommodations. Flagging is the practice of annotating score reports of individuals who receive extended test time due to disability, something which the College Board (SAT, AP, and other exams) and the ACT folks have not used in the last ten years.
The Consent Decree is the result of a lawsuit brought by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, several individual students (represented by The Legal Aid Society - Employment Law Center), and the U.S. Department of Justice against the LSAC. Its terms are sweeping and include:
- An end to flagging of LSAT scores
- Creation of a panel of experts to establish "best practices" in handling accommodations, which the LSAC shall be required to implement
- Creation of a fund of almost seven million dollars to compensate individuals who were turned down for LSAT accommodations because of inappropriate requirements by the LSAC.
- Permitting many candidates to submit testing conducted within five years of the date of the request for testing accommodations, instead of within three years as currently required.
These changes are long overdue and should bring fundamental fairness to an exam that is a required by virtually every law school in the country. Anyone even thinking of applying to law school should read this decree in its entirety.